C. Mendiola

26 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

C. Mendiola
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 194
  • Reproductive Medicine 142
  • Cancer Research 88
  • Oncology 135
  • Toxicology 9
Replace Valentina Tuninetti with:
Valentina Tuninetti Italy
Gloria Mittica Italy
Giuseppa Maltese Italy
Huimin Bai China
Christopher J. Darus United States
Alessandro Villanucci Italy
Alvaro Ingles Garces United Kingdom
Naoki Ogane Japan
Eizo Kimura Japan
Paule Augereau France
C. Mendiola relative to Valentina Tuninetti Italy Valentina Tuninetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
Valentina Tuninetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Mendiola

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Mendiola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Mendiola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Mendiola more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Mendiola

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Mendiola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Mendiola. The network helps show where C. Mendiola may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Mendiola, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Mendiola Line = papers co-authored together C. Mendiola links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003161
2 200791
3 201074
4 199451
5 200650
6 200042
7 200537
8 200326
9 201817
10 200716
11
An international multicentre Phase III study of BAY 12-9566 (BAY) versus placebo in patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer (OVCA) responsive to primary surgery/Paclitaxel + Platinum containing chemotherapy (CT)
200115
12 199813
13
Early clinical trial with quelamycin.
197911
14 200911
15 201211
16 198210
17 20139
18 19938
19 19978
20
A phase I/II study of paclitaxel plus cisplatin as first-line therapy for head and neck cancers: preliminary results.
19955

About C. Mendiola

C. Mendiola is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology and Toxicology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (1 paper), Testicular diseases and treatments (1 paper) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (194 citations), Reproductive Medicine (142 citations), Cancer Research (88 citations), Oncology (135 citations) and Toxicology (9 citations). C. Mendiola has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Belgium and Italy. Frequent co-authors include H. Cortés-Funes, Eva Ciruelos, Luis G Paz-Ares, Silvia Pecorelli, Jan Baptist Vermorken, PILAR LIANES, Jose Ignacio Mayordomo, Fernando Rivera, M. López-Brea and E. Mickiewicz. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, Clinical & Translational Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, Breast Cancer Research and Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact