C. M. Rush
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 1%
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
- Horticulture top 2%
Papers in
- Plant Science 107
- Plant Virus Research Studies 47
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 27
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens 24
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 15
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 30
- Co-authors
- F. Workneh (50 shared papers)Li Paetzold (21 shared papers)K. Steddom (7 shared papers)Robert M. Harveson (4 shared papers)Arash Rashed (12 shared papers)Jacob A. Price (11 shared papers)Barry Hounsome (1 shared paper)A. G. Chalmers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Plant Disease (43 papers)Phytopathology (22 papers)Radio Science (14 papers)Crop Protection (4 papers)American Journal of Potato Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandTaiwan
In The Last Decade
C. M. Rush
150 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Endocrinology 367
- Horticulture 65
- Plant Science 2.0k
- Insect Science 353
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 339
Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Rush
This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Rush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Rush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Rush. The network helps show where C. M. Rush may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. M. Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 166 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The British survey of fertiliser practice. Fertiliser use on farm crops for crop year 2000. | 2001 | 103 |
| 2 | 2005 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 67 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 64 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 61 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 60 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 54 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 53 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 49 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 48 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 44 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 41 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 38 |
About C. M. Rush
C. M. Rush is a scholar working on Plant Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Insect Science, Aerospace Engineering and Endocrinology, having authored 166 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (47 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (30 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (27 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (24 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (21 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (16 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (15 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (367 citations), Horticulture (65 citations), Plant Science (2.0k citations), Insect Science (353 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (339 citations). C. M. Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include F. Workneh, Li Paetzold, K. Steddom, Robert M. Harveson, Arash Rashed, Jacob A. Price, Barry Hounsome, A. G. Chalmers, G. J. Michels and A. D. Richmond. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Disease, Phytopathology, Radio Science, Crop Protection and American Journal of Potato Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.