C. King
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 2
- Ovarian function and disorders 2
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 1
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 3
- Co-authors
- Lyn Watson (1 shared paper)David L. Healy (1 shared paper)Judith M Lumley (1 shared paper)Alison Venn (1 shared paper)Geoffrey Gilles (1 shared paper)J. F. LEETON (4 shared papers)D. L. Healy (1 shared paper)Peter Adrian Rogers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (2 papers)Human Reproduction (1 paper)Acta veterinaria Scandinavica (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
C. King
6 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Reproductive Medicine 197
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 37
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 40
- Agronomy and Crop Science 19
Countries citing papers authored by C. King
This map shows the geographic impact of C. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. King. The network helps show where C. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside C. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 252 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 42 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 24 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 4 |
About C. King
C. King is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Small Animals and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (1 paper), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (1 paper), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (1 paper) and Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (197 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (37 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (104 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (40 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (19 citations). C. King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lyn Watson, David L. Healy, Judith M Lumley, Alison Venn, Geoffrey Gilles, J. F. LEETON, D. L. Healy, Peter Adrian Rogers, Robert Justin Irvine and Steve D. Albon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Human Reproduction, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, The Lancet and Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.