Peter A. Jackson

726 citations
16 papers · 588 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter A. Jackson

15 papers receiving 545 citations

Peers

Peter A. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cancer Research 203
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 152
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Gastroenterology 34
  • Reproductive Medicine 30
Replace Shahid Jamal with:
Shahid Jamal Pakistan
Shing Shun N Siu Hong Kong
Yiqian Wu United States
Sanjay Sengupta India
H.D. Zakhour United Kingdom
Ana Paula Martins Sebastião Brazil
Y Okudaira Japan
Amit Kumar Adhya India
David R. Kafonek United States
T Mørk Norway
Peter A. Jackson relative to Shahid Jamal Pakistan Shahid Jamal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.8×
Shahid Jamal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Jackson. The network helps show where Peter A. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter A. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter A. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Peter A. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1994151
2 201083
3 199363
4 200062
5 199252
6 199448
7 199633
8 197928
9 199524
10 199516
11 20139
12 19968
13 20157
14 20162
15 20161
16 20161

About Peter A. Jackson

Peter A. Jackson is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 16 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (2 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (203 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (152 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Gastroenterology (34 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (30 citations). Peter A. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include M.W. Kissin, Grace McKee, Ivan Robinson, James A. d’Arcy, A.G. Nicholson, Catherine M. Corbishley, Patrick Goggin, George G. Spomer, William Merchant and W.J. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Gut, Australian Dental Journal, Gastroenterology, Journal of Clinical Pathology and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact