C E Piersen

13 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

C E Piersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 225
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 199
  • Biochemistry 63
  • Pharmacology 71
  • Physiology 33
Replace Tomoki Hirakawa with:
Tomoki Hirakawa Japan
W.M. Keung Hong Kong
Eric T. Gugger United States
Annette P. Thelen United States
Veronika Slivova United States
J. O'Neal Johnston United States
Katsuhisa Sakano Japan
Yu Xia China
Silvio Fiala United States
Marina Orlandi Italy
C E Piersen relative to Tomoki Hirakawa Japan Tomoki Hirakawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Tomoki Hirakawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C E Piersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C E Piersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C E Piersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C E Piersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C E Piersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C E Piersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C E Piersen. The network helps show where C E Piersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C E Piersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C E Piersen Line = papers co-authored together C E Piersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2003159
2 1996149
3 2009133
4 200090
5 200672
6 200360
7 199555
8 200444
9 200234
10 199434
11
Evidence for an imino intermediate in the dna polymerase beta deoxyribose phosphate excision reaction
199633
12 200926
13 19945

About C E Piersen

C E Piersen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoestrogen effects and research (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (225 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (199 citations), Biochemistry (63 citations), Pharmacology (71 citations) and Physiology (33 citations). C E Piersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and China. Frequent co-authors include R. Stephen Lloyd, Norman R. Farnsworth, Rajendra Prasad, Samuel H. Wilson, Judy L. Bolton, Amanda K. McCullough, Richard B. van Breemen, Suzanne Banuvar, L.P. Shulman and Stacie Geller. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Pharmacology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, Integrative Cancer Therapies and Phytomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact