C. E. Peterson

1.4k citations
59 papers · 1000 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 11
    • Garlic and Onion Studies 6
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 6
    • Plant Pathogens and Resistance 5
    • Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research 14

C. E. Peterson

57 papers receiving 862 citations

Peers

C. E. Peterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Horticulture 144
  • Biochemistry 119
  • Plant Science 649
  • Insect Science 105
  • Genetics 215
Replace A. M. Rhodes with:
A. M. Rhodes United States
Harry S. Paris Israel
José X. Chaparro United States
Yosef Burger Israel
Iris E. Peralta Argentina
Fenny Dane United States
Zhanao Deng United States
Dina A. St. Clair United States
Tokurou Shimizu Japan
Pablo Aleza Spain
C. E. Peterson relative to A. M. Rhodes United States A. M. Rhodes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
A. M. Rhodes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Peterson. The network helps show where C. E. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. E. Peterson Line = papers co-authored together C. E. Peterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960102
2 198583
3 198060
4 198253
5 196945
6 198045
7 198941
8 196133
9 198031
10 197530
11 198430
12 196928
13 198026
14
A gynoecious inbred line of cucumber.
196024
15 197923
16 199021
17 198618
18 199618
19 195617
20 199017

About C. E. Peterson

C. E. Peterson is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Horticulture and Food Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (14 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (11 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (10 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (6 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Potato Plant Research (6 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (144 citations), Biochemistry (119 citations), Plant Science (649 citations), Insect Science (105 citations) and Genetics (215 citations). C. E. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Philipp W. Simon, Leonard M. Pike, R.C. Lindsay, Robert C. Lindsay, Robert L. Edmonds, Heather E. Erickson, E. H. Erickson, Bruce C. Carlton, N. E. Tolbert and F. A. Bliss. Their work appears in journals such as HortScience, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, American Journal of Potato Research, Euphytica and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact