C. E. Peterson

1.4k citations
62 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 11
    • Garlic and Onion Studies 6
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 6
    • Plant Pathogens and Resistance 5
    • Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research 14

C. E. Peterson

59 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers

C. E. Peterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Horticulture 164
  • Biochemistry 133
  • Plant Science 764
  • Food Science 174
  • Genetics 242
Replace A. M. Rhodes with:
A. M. Rhodes United States
Yosef Burger Israel
James P. Prince United States
C. M. Rick United States
Z. Karchi Israel
Harry S. Paris Israel
José X. Chaparro United States
Iris E. Peralta Argentina
Fenny Dane United States
Gennaro Fazio United States
C. E. Peterson relative to A. M. Rhodes United States A. M. Rhodes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
A. M. Rhodes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Peterson. The network helps show where C. E. Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Peterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. E. Peterson Line = papers co-authored together C. E. Peterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960114
2 198586
3 198072
4 198260
5 198057
6 198953
7 196953
8 196146
9 198042
10 197534
11 196933
12 198431
13 198030
14
A gynoecious inbred line of cucumber.
196026
15 197924
16 199623
17 199022
18 198620
19 195618
20 197918

About C. E. Peterson

C. E. Peterson is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Horticulture and Food Science, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (14 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (11 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (10 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers), Potato Plant Research (7 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (6 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (164 citations), Biochemistry (133 citations), Plant Science (764 citations), Food Science (174 citations) and Genetics (242 citations). C. E. Peterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Philipp W. Simon, Leonard M. Pike, R.C. Lindsay, Robert C. Lindsay, Robert L. Edmonds, Heather E. Erickson, E. H. Erickson, N. E. Tolbert, Bruce C. Carlton and F. A. Bliss. Their work appears in journals such as HortScience, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, American Journal of Potato Research, Euphytica and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact