C. Dyer

449 citations
136 papers · 244 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

C. Dyer

96 papers receiving 212 citations

Peers

C. Dyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Pharmacy 32
  • Health Information Management 12
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 50
  • General Health Professions 64
Replace Ann Sommerville with:
Ann Sommerville United Kingdom
Michelle Cook United States
David Klemperer Germany
Richard M. Ratzan United States
Eleanor Milligan Australia
Pernille Andreassen Denmark
Nezhat Shakeri Iran
Rachel C Forcino United States
Rahim Kaba United Kingdom
Akilah A. Jefferson United States
C. Dyer relative to Ann Sommerville United Kingdom Ann Sommerville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Ann Sommerville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Dyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Dyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Dyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Dyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Dyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Dyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Dyer. The network helps show where C. Dyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside C. Dyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Dyer Line = papers co-authored together C. Dyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198311
2 199610
3 19979
4 20129
5 20038
6 19966
7 20026
8 20046
9 19996
10 20005
11 20085
12 19944
13 20154
14 20194
15 20154
16 20124
17 20004
18 19994
19 19994
20 19963

About C. Dyer

C. Dyer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 136 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Challenges (56 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (37 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (36 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (16 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (10 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (10 papers) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), Pharmacy (32 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (50 citations) and General Health Professions (64 citations). C. Dyer has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include K. M. Laurence, Kate Downey, David Luesley, Mahmood I. Shafi, Paul A. Byrne, G. Constantine and Deborah Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Prenatal Diagnosis, European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, BMJ and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact