C. Dumas
Impact in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 17
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 11
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 5
- Renal and related cancers 4
- Co-authors
- C. E. Pope (22 shared papers)B. L. Dresser (17 shared papers)M. C. Gómez (20 shared papers)Justine Lyons (4 shared papers)David Ricks (4 shared papers)Monica López (6 shared papers)Leslie A. Lyons (4 shared papers)Jakob Reiser (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Reproduction Fertility and Development (15 papers)Cellular Reprogramming (2 papers)Theriogenology (2 papers)Reproduction in Domestic Animals (1 paper)Cloning and Stem Cells (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. Dumas
23 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 233
- Reproductive Medicine 58
- Genetics 119
- Molecular Biology 248
- Genetics 21
Countries citing papers authored by C. Dumas
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Dumas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Dumas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Dumas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Dumas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Dumas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Dumas. The network helps show where C. Dumas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside C. Dumas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 90 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2 |
About C. Dumas
C. Dumas is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Surgery and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (17 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (11 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (10 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers), Renal and related cancers (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (233 citations), Reproductive Medicine (58 citations), Genetics (119 citations), Molecular Biology (248 citations) and Genetics (21 citations). C. Dumas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include C. E. Pope, B. L. Dresser, M. C. Gómez, Justine Lyons, David Ricks, Monica López, Leslie A. Lyons, Jakob Reiser, Robert Kutner and Jill A. Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction Fertility and Development, Cellular Reprogramming, Theriogenology, Reproduction in Domestic Animals and Cloning and Stem Cells.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.