C Deal
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
-
- Ion channel regulation and function
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 7
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 3
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 3
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 7
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1
- Co-authors
- Edwin C. Johnson (9 shared papers)Michael M. Harpold (5 shared papers)Paul F. Brust (4 shared papers)S.B. Ellis (4 shared papers)Michael Hans (3 shared papers)Margiad Williams (2 shared papers)Gönül Veliçelebi (6 shared papers)R. J. Miller (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (3 papers)Neuropharmacology (2 papers)Journal of Neurochemistry (2 papers)Biophysical Journal (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
C Deal
9 papers receiving 625 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 468
- Molecular Biology 561
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 100
- Sensory Systems 15
- Physiology 54
Countries citing papers authored by C Deal
This map shows the geographic impact of C Deal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Deal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Deal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C Deal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Deal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Deal. The network helps show where C Deal may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C Deal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 252 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 92 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 45 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 21 |
About C Deal
C Deal is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biochemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (468 citations), Molecular Biology (561 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (100 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations) and Physiology (54 citations). C Deal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Edwin C. Johnson, Michael M. Harpold, Paul F. Brust, S.B. Ellis, Michael Hans, Margiad Williams, Gönül Veliçelebi, R. J. Miller, Lisa M. Marubio and Louis H. Philipson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Neuropharmacology, Journal of Neurochemistry, Biophysical Journal and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.