C. de Lisio

3.1k citations
84 papers · 2.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

C. de Lisio

82 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

C. de Lisio
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.7k
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 33
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 255
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 256
  • Artificial Intelligence 370
Replace Frank Großmann with:
Frank Großmann Germany
Y. M. Galperin Norway
Ren‐Bao Liu Hong Kong
G.H.C. New United Kingdom
Pavel Polynkin United States
Thomas Halfmann Germany
Marco Marangoni Italy
C. M. Bowden United States
D. G. Papazoglou Greece
Shinobu Onoda Japan
C. de Lisio relative to Frank Großmann Germany Frank Großmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Frank Großmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. de Lisio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. de Lisio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. de Lisio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. de Lisio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. de Lisio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. de Lisio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. de Lisio. The network helps show where C. de Lisio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. de Lisio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. de Lisio Line = papers co-authored together C. de Lisio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012325
2 2017232
3 2000212
4 2013146
5 2015141
6 2016115
7 200259
8 200058
9 199956
10 200255
11 200050
12 200339
13 202238
14 200538
15 200032
16 200431
17 201729
18 200725
19 200524
20 200624

About C. de Lisio

C. de Lisio is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Mechanics of Materials and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (25 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (13 papers), Laser Design and Applications (12 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (11 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (10 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (9 papers) and Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.7k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (33 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (255 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (256 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (370 citations). C. de Lisio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Romania and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lorenzo Marrucci, Filippo Cardano, Enrico Santamato, Ebrahim Karimi, C. Altucci, R. Bruzzese, Sergei Slussarenko, Maria Maffei, Luca Poletto and S. Stagira. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Applied Physics B, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, Optics and Lasers in Engineering and Optics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact