C. Chen

42 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers

C. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Condensed Matter Physics 514
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 211
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 53
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 6
  • Materials Chemistry 32
Replace Th. Mühge with:
Th. Mühge Germany
Mohamed Lachab United Kingdom
Masafumi Jo Japan
K. Tsubaki Japan
L. Deák Hungary
Kenneth A. Epstein United States
R. Mickevičius United States
Joachim Krüger United States
A. Ketterson United States
D. Munzar Czechia
C. Chen relative to Th. Mühge Germany Th. Mühge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Th. Mühge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Chen. The network helps show where C. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Chen Line = papers co-authored together C. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997144
2 2017143
3 199452
4 199341
5 199435
6 199932
7 199628
8 199927
9 199226
10 201825
11 201821
12 199620
13 201720
14 199619
15 200315
16 199614
17 199914
18 199512
19 200511
20 19938

About C. Chen

C. Chen is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 42 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (38 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (4 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (1 paper), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (1 paper) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (514 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (211 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (53 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (6 citations) and Materials Chemistry (32 citations). C. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara M. Wanklyn, Aswini Kumar Pradhan, John F. Ryan, P. Chaddah, Sthitadhi Roy, Christopher John Stevens, David Cecil Smith, Dragan Mihailovic, J.W. Hodby and Boštjan Podobnik. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Solid State Communications, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Journal of Crystal Growth and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact