C. C. Ford
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
-
- Nuclear Structure and Function
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- RNA Research and Splicing
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 2
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 2
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 4
- Co-authors
- Robert M. Benbow (2 shared papers)J. B. Gurdon (1 shared paper)Keith Campbell (1 shared paper)Christopher J. Hutchison (1 shared paper)Reimer Stick (1 shared paper)Chris Hutchison (2 shared papers)Richard F. Cox (2 shared papers)Hugh R. Woodland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Cell Science (4 papers)Development (3 papers)Developmental Biology (2 papers)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (1 paper)Bioscience Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
C. C. Ford
16 papers receiving 658 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cell Biology 211
- Molecular Biology 553
- Aging 13
- Reproductive Medicine 49
- Physiology 27
Countries citing papers authored by C. C. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of C. C. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. C. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. C. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. C. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. C. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. C. Ford. The network helps show where C. C. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. C. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 159 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 117 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 73 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 66 | |
| 5 | 1975 | 50 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 48 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 39 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 28 | |
| 12 | 1975 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1 |
About C. C. Ford
C. C. Ford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper) and Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (211 citations), Molecular Biology (553 citations), Aging (13 citations), Reproductive Medicine (49 citations) and Physiology (27 citations). C. C. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. Benbow, J. B. Gurdon, Keith Campbell, Christopher J. Hutchison, Reimer Stick, Chris Hutchison, Richard F. Cox, Hugh R. Woodland, J. Eisenfeld and Miranda Gomperts. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cell Science, Development, Developmental Biology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Bioscience Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.