C. Amanda Schweizer

20 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

C. Amanda Schweizer
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Applied Psychology 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 138
  • Clinical Psychology 112
  • Physiology 93
  • General Health Professions 75
Replace Rubén Rodríguez‐Cano with:
Rubén Rodríguez‐Cano Spain
Mahmoud Elhabiby Egypt
Justin M. Shepherd United States
Steven F. Babbin United States
Yuzhu Hao China
Brianna M. Sullivan United States
Mariam Dum United States
Philip Clemmey United States
Tanya Smit United States
Bianca Jardin United States
C. Amanda Schweizer relative to Rubén Rodríguez‐Cano Spain Rubén Rodríguez‐Cano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Rubén Rodríguez‐Cano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Amanda Schweizer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Amanda Schweizer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Amanda Schweizer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Amanda Schweizer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Amanda Schweizer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Amanda Schweizer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Amanda Schweizer. The network helps show where C. Amanda Schweizer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Amanda Schweizer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Amanda Schweizer Line = papers co-authored together C. Amanda Schweizer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201782
2 201274
3 201359
4 201739
5 201019
6 201617
7 201317
8 201915
9 201312
10 201810
11 20187
12 20187
13 20166
14 20186
15 20115
16 20125
17 20132
18 20132
19 20231
20 20241

About C. Amanda Schweizer

C. Amanda Schweizer is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers) and Youth Substance Use and School Attendance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (78 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (138 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations), Physiology (93 citations) and General Health Professions (75 citations). C. Amanda Schweizer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Mark G. Myers, Neal Doran, Katherine J. Hoggatt, Tracy L. Simpson, Marketa Krenek, Keren Lehavot, Rubin Khoddam, Lianne Tomfohr‐Madsen, José S. Loredo and Joel E. Dimsdale. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, Women s Health Issues, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Nicotine & Tobacco Research and Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact