Byron Hawk

460 citations
18 papers · 190 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Byron Hawk

16 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Byron Hawk
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Philosophy 77
  • Literature and Literary Theory 43
  • Human-Computer Interaction 16
  • Communication 19
  • Cultural Studies 21
Replace Ulrich P. Schmitz with:
Ulrich P. Schmitz Germany
Anthony Enns Canada
Alexander T. Bergs Germany
Klaus Sachs-Hombach Germany
Theresa Heyd Germany
Thomas Swiss United States
Helmuth Feilke Germany
Gudrun Held Austria
Julie Wosk United States
Tanya Krzywinska United Kingdom
Byron Hawk relative to Ulrich P. Schmitz Germany Ulrich P. Schmitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Ulrich P. Schmitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Byron Hawk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Byron Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Byron Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Byron Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Byron Hawk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Byron Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Byron Hawk. The network helps show where Byron Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Byron Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Byron Hawk Line = papers co-authored together Byron Hawk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200958
2
A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity
200728
3 200420
4 200720
5 201817
6 201810
7
Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools
20088
8 20067
9 20114
10 20174
11 20224
12
Toward a Rhetoric of Network (Media) Culture: Notes on Polarities and Potentiality
20163
13 20183
14 20032
15 20021
16 20131
17
Resounding the Rhetorical: Composition as a Quasi-Object
20180
18 20220

About Byron Hawk

Byron Hawk is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Philosophy of Science and Communication, having authored 18 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (8 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (5 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (3 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (3 papers), Cybernetics and Technology in Society (3 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (2 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers) and Linguistics and Education Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (77 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (16 citations), Communication (19 citations) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). Byron Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheryl E. Ball, Caroline Gottschalk Druschke, Joshua Stanley Hanan, Qwo-Li Driskill, Nathaniel A. Rivers, Jessica Enoch, David M. Grant, Laurie E. Gries, Edward M. White and Thomas Rickert. Their work appears in journals such as Technical Communication Quarterly, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, College English, Computers & composition and Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact