Byron Hawk

437 citations
16 papers · 197 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Byron Hawk

15 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Byron Hawk
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Literature and Literary Theory 71
  • Human-Computer Interaction 29
  • Philosophy 51
  • Communication 30
  • Cultural Studies 24
Replace Nathaniel A. Rivers with:
Nathaniel A. Rivers United States
Laurie E. Gries United States
Jens Eder Germany
Michael Cronin United States
Jenny Rice United States
Alison Gibbons United Kingdom
Kristie S. Fleckenstein United States
Luke Carson Canada
Gregg Lambert United States
Victor J. Vitanza United States
Byron Hawk relative to Nathaniel A. Rivers United States Nathaniel A. Rivers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nathaniel A. Rivers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Byron Hawk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Byron Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Byron Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Byron Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Byron Hawk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Byron Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Byron Hawk. The network helps show where Byron Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Byron Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Byron Hawk Line = papers co-authored together Byron Hawk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200959
2
A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity
200734
3 200722
4 200421
5 201817
6
Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools
200810
7 201810
8 20175
9 20224
10 20114
11 20183
12
Toward a Rhetoric of Network (Media) Culture: Notes on Polarities and Potentiality
20162
13 20032
14
Resounding the Rhetorical: Composition as a Quasi-Object
20182
15 20131
16 20021

About Byron Hawk

Byron Hawk is a scholar working on Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 16 papers that have together received 197 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media, Communication, and Education (3 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (1 paper), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (1 paper), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (1 paper) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (71 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (29 citations), Philosophy (51 citations), Communication (30 citations) and Cultural Studies (24 citations). Byron Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Kristin L. Arola, John Ackerman, Joshua S. Hanan, Jessica Enoch, Laurie E. Gries, Lynn Z. Bloom, Thomas Rickert, David M. Grant, Qwo-Li Driskill and Caroline Gottschalk Druschke. Their work appears in journals such as Technical Communication Quarterly, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, College English, Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture and Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact