Brooke E. Sylvester
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Oncology top 10%
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Papers in
- Oncology 4
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 3
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 1
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 1
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 3
- Co-authors
- David B. Solit (5 shared papers)Efsevia Vakiani (3 shared papers)Andrea Cercek (3 shared papers)Nancy E. Kemeny (3 shared papers)Rona Yaeger (3 shared papers)Martin R. Weiser (3 shared papers)Leonard B. Saltz (3 shared papers)Marc Ladanyi (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Cancer Research (2 papers)Genome biology (1 paper)Future Oncology (1 paper)Cancer (1 paper)Genome Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Brooke E. Sylvester
9 papers receiving 829 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Cancer Research 267
- Oncology 337
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 210
- Hepatology 64
- Molecular Biology 307
Countries citing papers authored by Brooke E. Sylvester
This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke E. Sylvester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke E. Sylvester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke E. Sylvester more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke E. Sylvester
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke E. Sylvester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke E. Sylvester. The network helps show where Brooke E. Sylvester may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brooke E. Sylvester, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 264 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 158 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 142 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 107 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 72 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 1 |
About Brooke E. Sylvester
Brooke E. Sylvester is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (1 paper) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (267 citations), Oncology (337 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (210 citations), Hepatology (64 citations) and Molecular Biology (307 citations). Brooke E. Sylvester has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David B. Solit, Efsevia Vakiani, Andrea Cercek, Nancy E. Kemeny, Rona Yaeger, Martin R. Weiser, Leonard B. Saltz, Marc Ladanyi, Michael I. D’Angelica and A. Rose Brannon. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, Genome biology, Future Oncology, Cancer and Genome Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.