Brooke E. Schefrin

19 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Brooke E. Schefrin
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 458
  • Ophthalmology 150
  • Social Psychology 204
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 203
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
Replace Margaret Lutze with:
Margaret Lutze United States
J. A. Harlow United Kingdom
Janice L. Nerger United States
Gunilla Derefeldt Sweden
David H. Peterzell United States
Terry Benzschawel United States
J. D. Moreland United Kingdom
Yun Hsia Taiwan
Holger Knau Germany
Alex S. Baldwin Canada
Brooke E. Schefrin relative to Margaret Lutze United States Margaret Lutze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Margaret Lutze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brooke E. Schefrin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke E. Schefrin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke E. Schefrin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke E. Schefrin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke E. Schefrin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke E. Schefrin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke E. Schefrin. The network helps show where Brooke E. Schefrin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Brooke E. Schefrin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brooke E. Schefrin Line = papers co-authored together Brooke E. Schefrin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1990107
2 199389
3 199986
4 200070
5 200048
6 199842
7 199342
8 200139
9 199536
10 199232
11 199723
12 198716
13
Anomalies beyond sites of chromatic opponency contribute to sensitivity losses of an S-cone pathway in diabetes
199112
14 200312
15 200010
16 20008
17 19875
18
The area of complete spatial summation enlarges with age
19971
19 19941

About Brooke E. Schefrin

Brooke E. Schefrin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Color Science and Applications (3 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (3 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (458 citations), Ophthalmology (150 citations), Social Psychology (204 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (203 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations). Brooke E. Schefrin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John S. Werner, Michelle L. Bieber, Keizo Shinomori, Stephen Tregear, Lewis O. Harvey, Vicki J. Volbrecht, Ryan McLean, Anthony J. Adams, Eugene Switkes and David H. Peterzell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Color Research & Application, Vision Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Optometry and Vision Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact