Broadus Mitchell

24 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers

Broadus Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Public Administration 27
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26
  • Political Science and International Relations 75
  • Marketing 25
  • Economics and Econometrics 61
Replace Paul Studenski with:
Paul Studenski Japan
Henry Parris United States
Clarence L. Barber Canada
Henry J. Friendly United States
Carl Parrini United States
Richard Schragger United States
Richard A. Rempel Canada
Carl F. Brand United States
Richard T. Griffiths Netherlands
Robert Marjolin
Broadus Mitchell relative to Paul Studenski Japan Paul Studenski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Paul Studenski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Broadus Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Broadus Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Broadus Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Broadus Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Broadus Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Broadus Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Broadus Mitchell. The network helps show where Broadus Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Broadus Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Broadus Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Broadus Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196158
2 197528
3 196227
4 196222
5 19649
6 19769
7 19635
8 19574
9 19613
10
Great economists in their times
19662
11 19642
12 19582
13 19582
14 19642
15 19642
16 19652
17 19781
18 19641
19 19761
20 20171

About Broadus Mitchell

Broadus Mitchell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, History, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers), American History and Culture (7 papers), American Sports and Literature (4 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (27 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (26 citations), Political Science and International Relations (75 citations), Marketing (25 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (61 citations). Broadus Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Irving Bernstein, William Appleman Williams, Harold C. Syrett, Jacob E. Cooke, Robert Sobel, Noble E. Cunningham, George Dangerfield, John R. Alden, Robert Brown and Clinton Rossiter. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The Journal of Southern History, The William and Mary Quarterly and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact