Bridget Copley

665 citations
11 papers · 226 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Bridget Copley

10 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Bridget Copley
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Language and Linguistics 178
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 100
  • Linguistics and Language 34
  • Philosophy 67
  • Artificial Intelligence 77
Replace Sophia A. Malamud with:
Sophia A. Malamud United States
L. F. Marti United Kingdom
Elisabeth Villalta Germany
Orin Percus France
Michela Ippolito Canada
Alda Mari France
Vincent Homer United States
Magdalena Kaufmann United States
Corien Bary Netherlands
Hazel Pearson United States
Bridget Copley relative to Sophia A. Malamud United States Sophia A. Malamud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sophia A. Malamud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Copley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Copley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Copley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Copley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Copley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Copley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Copley. The network helps show where Bridget Copley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Bridget Copley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bridget Copley Line = papers co-authored together Bridget Copley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2009104
2 201528
3 201428
4 200823
5
What should "should" mean?
200616
6 201811
7
Ordering and Reasoning
20056
8 20014
9
A Linguistic Argument for Indeterministic Futures
20023
10 20162
11
The emergence of Merge and recursion in the transition from single words to sentences
20151

About Bridget Copley

Bridget Copley is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper), linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (178 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (100 citations), Linguistics and Language (34 citations), Philosophy (67 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (77 citations). Bridget Copley has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Heidi Harley, Fabienne Martin, Phillip Wolff, Jason Shepard, Isabelle Roy and Lorraine McCune. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistic Inquiry, Linguistics and Philosophy, Glossa a journal of general linguistics, Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory and HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact