Hazel Pearson
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
-
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 9
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies 6
-
- Natural Language Processing Techniques 2
- Semantic Web and Ontologies 1
- Co-authors
- Jesse Snedeker (2 shared papers)Tom Roeper (1 shared paper)Colleen Cotter (1 shared paper)Linnaea Stockall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Sociolinguistics (1 paper)Natural Language Semantics (1 paper)European Journal of Risk Regulation (1 paper)Inquiry (1 paper)Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Hazel Pearson
12 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Language and Linguistics 133
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
- Philosophy 67
- Linguistics and Language 21
- Artificial Intelligence 54
Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Pearson. The network helps show where Hazel Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 6 | A New Semantics for Group Nouns | 2011 | 12 |
| 7 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 8 | How to do comparison in a language without degrees: a semantics for the comparative in Fijian | 2009 | 6 |
| 9 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 0 |
About Hazel Pearson
Hazel Pearson is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Communication, having authored 14 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (3 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (1 paper), Agricultural safety and regulations (1 paper) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (133 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), Philosophy (67 citations), Linguistics and Language (21 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (54 citations). Hazel Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Snedeker, Tom Roeper, Colleen Cotter and Linnaea Stockall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sociolinguistics, Natural Language Semantics, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Inquiry and Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.