Brian Wecht

2.1k citations
28 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Wecht

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Brian Wecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.1k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 639
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 328
  • Geometry and Topology 205
  • Mathematical Physics 77
Replace Lorenz Eberhardt with:
Lorenz Eberhardt United States
Sangmin Lee South Korea
Ricardo Schiappa Portugal
Eric Perlmutter United States
Thomas T. Dumitrescu United States
Min-xin Huang China
Carlo Angelantonj Italy
Yasuyuki Hatsuda Japan
Kazumi Okuyama Japan
Simeon Hellerman Japan
Brian Wecht relative to Lorenz Eberhardt United States Lorenz Eberhardt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.7×
Lorenz Eberhardt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Wecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Wecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Wecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Wecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Wecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Wecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Wecht. The network helps show where Brian Wecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Wecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Wecht Line = papers co-authored together Brian Wecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006215
2 2012142
3 2001106
4 200484
5 200777
6 200463
7 201262
8 200348
9 200842
10 201340
11
Exactly marginal deformations and global symmetries
201637
12 200535
13 200634
14 200926
15 201221
16 200517
17 200316
18 200915
19 201213
20 201712

About Brian Wecht

Brian Wecht is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (25 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (6 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (639 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (328 citations), Geometry and Topology (205 citations) and Mathematical Physics (77 citations). Brian Wecht has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ibrahima Bah, Christopher Beem, Nikolay Bobev, Kenneth Intriligator, Amihay Hanany, Dario Martelli, David Vegh, Sebastián Franco, James Sparks and Jessie Shelton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Nuclear Physics B, Nuclear Fusion, Physical review. D and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact