Brian S. Scott

1.1k citations
26 papers · 866 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Brian S. Scott

26 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers

Brian S. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 429
  • Developmental Neuroscience 91
  • Clinical Psychology 129
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 95
  • Neurology 37
Replace Shosh Gil with:
Shosh Gil Israel
M. R. C. Psych United Kingdom
Mila Roceri Italy
Jordan Marrocco United States
MaiBritt Giacobini Sweden
M J Owen United Kingdom
Dominikus Bönsch Germany
Anzhelika Engel Germany
Emanuela Morelli Italy
Nadia Cattane Italy
Brian S. Scott relative to Shosh Gil Israel Shosh Gil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Shosh Gil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian S. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian S. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian S. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian S. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian S. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian S. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian S. Scott. The network helps show where Brian S. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Brian S. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian S. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Brian S. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970103
2 198384
3 197779
4 199976
5 198168
6 196965
7 197759
8 199747
9 197146
10 198836
11 198036
12 199532
13 198225
14 197922
15
Differential survival of fetal and adult neurons and non-neuronal cells exposed chronically to ethanol in cell culture.
198619
16 198118
17 197116
18 19897
19 19897
20 19855

About Brian S. Scott

Brian S. Scott is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 866 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (429 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (91 citations), Clinical Psychology (129 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (95 citations) and Neurology (37 citations). Brian S. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Kaleigh Fisher, Ted L. Petit, L. E. Becker, Leslie Atkinson, B. Cinader, Vivienne Chisholm, Susan Goldberg, Susan E. Dickens, Henry L. Minton and Thomas G. Bowman. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, Progress in Neurobiology, Experimental Cell Research and Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact