Brian Rooks

518 citations
14 papers · 336 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Rooks

14 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Brian Rooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 134
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
  • Clinical Psychology 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Replace Howe Synnott with:
Howe Synnott Australia
Rachael Spooner Australia
Denise R. LaBelle United States
Mariane Bagatin Bermúdez Brazil
Michal Goetz Czechia
Ross Brannigan Ireland
Natália Soncini Kapczinski Brazil
Erin C. Moon Canada
Feryal Çam Çelıkel Türkiye
Chiara Gonnelli Italy
Brian Rooks relative to Howe Synnott Australia Howe Synnott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Howe Synnott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Rooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Rooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Rooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Rooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Rooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Rooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Rooks. The network helps show where Brian Rooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Rooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Rooks Line = papers co-authored together Brian Rooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201771
2 201947
3 201945
4 201936
5 201627
6 202019
7 201719
8 201718
9 201717
10 201714
11 202012
12 20206
13 20204
14 20191

About Brian Rooks

Brian Rooks is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (134 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations). Brian Rooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include David Axelson, Benjamin I. Goldstein, Tina R. Goldstein, Rasim Somer Diler, John Merranko, Danella Hafeman, Kelly Monk, Boris Birmaher, Mary Beth Hickey and Dara Sakolsky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Nature Communications, NeuroImage Clinical and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact