Brian Huffman

441 citations
15 papers · 284 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Huffman

14 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Brian Huffman
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Software 49
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 173
  • Artificial Intelligence 228
  • Hardware and Architecture 23
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
Replace Joe Hurd with:
Joe Hurd United Kingdom
Clemens Ballarin Germany
Jakob von Raumer Germany
Sidi Ould Biha France
Matthieu Sozeau France
Ana Bove Sweden
Pierre Letouzey France
David Nowak France
David M. Russinoff United States
Silvia Ghilezan Serbia
Brian Huffman relative to Joe Hurd United Kingdom Joe Hurd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Joe Hurd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Huffman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Huffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Huffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Huffman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Huffman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Huffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Huffman. The network helps show where Brian Huffman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Brian Huffman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Huffman Line = papers co-authored together Brian Huffman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201385
2 201346
3 201840
4 201637
5 200514
6 201014
7 201313
8 200912
9 20129
10 20215
11 20134
12
Axiomatic constructor classes in Isabelle/HOLCF
20052
13
Free Boolean Algebra.
20101
14
Type Constructor Classes and Monad Transformers.
20121
15 20131

About Brian Huffman

Brian Huffman is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Signal Processing, Software and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (5 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (4 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (3 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (49 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (173 citations), Artificial Intelligence (228 citations), Hardware and Architecture (23 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Brian Huffman has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fabian Immler, Johannes Hölzl, Aaron Tomb, Christian Urban, Dylan McNamee, Robert Dockins, John Matthews, Serdar Taşiran, Byron Cook and S. Magill. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science and ACM SIGAda Ada Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact