Brian Darnley
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Papers in
-
- Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment 8
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 3
- Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse 1
-
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 2
- Co-authors
- David James (8 shared papers)Frank Farnham (8 shared papers)Michele Pathé (8 shared papers)J. Reid Meloy (8 shared papers)Lulu Preston (8 shared papers)Paul E. Mullen (5 shared papers)P.E. Mullen (3 shared papers)Troy E. McEwan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (2 papers)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)Behavioral Sciences & the Law (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brian Darnley
9 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Health 74
- Clinical Psychology 182
- Sociology and Political Science 296
- Social Psychology 107
- Gender Studies 8
Countries citing papers authored by Brian Darnley
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Darnley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Darnley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Darnley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Darnley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Darnley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Darnley. The network helps show where Brian Darnley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Brian Darnley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 4 | Attacks on the British Royal family: the role of psychotic illness. | 2008 | 41 |
| 5 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 1 |
About Brian Darnley
Brian Darnley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Philosophy and Demography, having authored 9 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (8 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Elder Abuse and Neglect (1 paper) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (74 citations), Clinical Psychology (182 citations), Sociology and Political Science (296 citations), Social Psychology (107 citations) and Gender Studies (8 citations). Brian Darnley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David James, Frank Farnham, Michele Pathé, J. Reid Meloy, Lulu Preston, Paul E. Mullen, P.E. Mullen, Troy E. McEwan, Rachel MacKenzie and Mario J. Scalora. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Psychological Medicine, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.