Brett Ives

436 citations
6 papers · 354 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Brett Ives

6 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Brett Ives
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 149
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Family Practice 5
  • General Health Professions 63
  • Genetics 54
Replace Aviva G. Nathan with:
Aviva G. Nathan United States
Nishant Uppal United States
Maria Soto‐Greene United States
Raimundo Celestino Silva Neves Brazil
Karen Carlson United States
Joanne Kellett United Kingdom
Diana M. Urlaub United States
Sarah E. Wawrzynski United States
Padaphet Sayakhot Australia
Aswathy Sreedevi India
Brett Ives relative to Aviva G. Nathan United States Aviva G. Nathan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Aviva G. Nathan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brett Ives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brett Ives's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett Ives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett Ives more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brett Ives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett Ives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett Ives. The network helps show where Brett Ives may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Brett Ives, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brett Ives Line = papers co-authored together Brett Ives links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
DIVERSE COMMUNITIES, COMMON CONCERNS: ASSESSING HEALTH CARE QUALITY FOR MINORITY AMERICANS FINDINGS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 2001 HEALTH CARE QUALITY SURVEY
2002119
2 2010104
3 200777
4 200931
5 200919
6 20154

About Brett Ives

Brett Ives is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 6 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (1 paper), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Health Education and Validation (1 paper) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (149 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), General Health Professions (63 citations) and Genetics (54 citations). Brett Ives has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer N. Edwards, Karen Scott Collins, Michelle M. Doty, Katrina J. Ruedy, Dongyuan Xing, Julie Coffey, Lynne S. Schilling, William V. Tamborlane, Jane Dixon and Margaret Grey. Their work appears in journals such as The Diabetes Educator, Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Nursing Research and Progress in community health partnerships.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact