Bret N. Smith

4.7k citations
100 papers · 3.7k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Bret N. Smith

98 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Bret N. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 262
  • Sensory Systems 239
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 793
Replace Jan de Vente with:
Jan de Vente Netherlands
Sue A. Aicher United States
Alvin J. Beitz United States
Marcelo O. Dietrich United States
Ann K. Goodchild Australia
D J Reis United States
Cinda J. Helke United States
Kazuo Sasaki Japan
George B. Richerson United States
Toshihiko Katafuchi Japan
Bret N. Smith relative to Jan de Vente Netherlands Jan de Vente's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jan de Vente · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bret N. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bret N. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret N. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret N. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bret N. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret N. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret N. Smith. The network helps show where Bret N. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bret N. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bret N. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Bret N. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000196
2 2002170
3 2008155
4 1994145
5 2013126
6 1999123
7 2004101
8 201099
9 200498
10 200088
11 200186
12 199882
13 201177
14 201075
15 200375
16 200171
17 201067
18 200666
19 201563
20 200662

About Bret N. Smith

Bret N. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (43 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (28 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (14 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (13 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (10 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (262 citations), Sensory Systems (239 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (793 citations). Bret N. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Hunt, F. Edward Dudek, Andrei V. Derbenev, William E. Armstrong, Nicholas R. Glatzer, F. Edward Dudek, Stephen W. Scheff, Jeffery A. Boychuk, Kevin W. Williams and Gary E. Pickard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Epiliepsy currents, Journal of Neuroscience, Experimental Neurology and The Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact