Bram Vanhecke

405 citations
19 papers · 243 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Bram Vanhecke

18 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

Bram Vanhecke
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Computational Mathematics 22
  • Condensed Matter Physics 134
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 201
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 57
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 17
Replace Toshiya Hikihara with:
Toshiya Hikihara Japan
Z. C. Wei China
Ho N. Phien Australia
Christian Krumnow Germany
D. N. Sheng United States
Thorsten B. Wahl United Kingdom
Aditya Shashi United States
Elena Canovi Germany
Reza Haghshenas United States
Bram Vanhecke relative to Toshiya Hikihara Japan Toshiya Hikihara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Toshiya Hikihara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bram Vanhecke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bram Vanhecke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bram Vanhecke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bram Vanhecke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bram Vanhecke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bram Vanhecke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bram Vanhecke. The network helps show where Bram Vanhecke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Bram Vanhecke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bram Vanhecke Line = papers co-authored together Bram Vanhecke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201842
2 201940
3 201922
4 202218
5 201916
6 202016
7 202215
8 199414
9 202213
10 202111
11 20237
12 20217
13 20235
14 20234
15 20224
16 20253
17 20253
18 19932
19
A new approach to the reliability of electronic material systems
19911

About Bram Vanhecke

Bram Vanhecke is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 19 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (15 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers), Model Reduction and Neural Networks (2 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (22 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (134 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (201 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (57 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (17 citations). Bram Vanhecke has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Austria and France. Frequent co-authors include Frank Verstraete, Laurens Vanderstraeten, Jutho Haegeman, Karel Van Acoleyen, Andreas M. Läuchli, Jens Eisert, Frédéric Mila, Julien Vidal, L.M. Stals and Philippe Corboz. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical Review Letters, Physical review. E, SciPost Physics and Microelectronics Reliability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact