Brad Williams

33 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Brad Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
  • Ecological Modeling 15
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
  • Political Science and International Relations 65
  • Cultural Studies 18
Replace Ed Wensing with:
Ed Wensing Australia
Emily Sinnott United States
Matthew Evenden Canada
Sarah Parks United Kingdom
Maurizio Farhan Ferrari Hungary
Julia Talbot-Jones New Zealand
Bernardo Aguilar‐González United States
Chrissy Grant Australia
Carl Bruch United States
Will Smith Australia
Brad Williams relative to Ed Wensing Australia Ed Wensing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ed Wensing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brad Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brad Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brad Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brad Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brad Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brad Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brad Williams. The network helps show where Brad Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brad Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brad Williams Line = papers co-authored together Brad Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201262
2 201443
3 198727
4 201010
5 20069
6 20138
7 20218
8 20058
9
Revenue Volatility in California
20056
10 20166
11 20135
12
Resolving the Russo-Japanese Territorial Dispute: Hokkaido-Sakhalin Relations
20075
13 20035
14 20064
15 20074
16 20033
17 20233
18
Wildlife Research and the IACUC
19993
19 20193
20 20102

About Brad Williams

Brad Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, General Health Professions and Ocean Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (3 papers), Coal Properties and Utilization (3 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations), Ecological Modeling (15 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (41 citations), Political Science and International Relations (65 citations) and Cultural Studies (18 citations). Brad Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Sutter, J. Kevin Hiers, Rebecca Mitchell, Analie Barnett, Michelle C. Mack, Erik Mobrand, Freddi Segal‐Gidan, Jo Marie Reilly, Roseann Mulligan and Michael R. Cousineau. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary Asia, The Nonproliferation Review, Intelligence & National Security, The Journal of Asian Studies and Problems of Post-Communism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact