Bowen Liu

25 papers receiving 213 citations

Peers

Bowen Liu
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Science Applications 45
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 50
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 27
  • Education 59
  • Hepatology 9
Replace Mercedes Rico with:
Mercedes Rico Spain
Minyue Zhang China
Bernhard Klingenberg United States
Ernesto Barceló Colombia
Sajad Shafiee Iran
Clement Chen United States
Katie Wilkinson United Kingdom
Kaisa M. A. Paldanius Finland
Michael Curran United States
Shifang Tang United States
Bowen Liu relative to Mercedes Rico Spain Mercedes Rico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Mercedes Rico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bowen Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bowen Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bowen Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bowen Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bowen Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bowen Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bowen Liu. The network helps show where Bowen Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bowen Liu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bowen Liu Line = papers co-authored together Bowen Liu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201131
2 202026
3 202220
4 201718
5 201816
6 202014
7 202213
8 202312
9 202111
10 20239
11 20218
12 20237
13 20237
14 20236
15 20234
16 20243
17 20233
18 20242
19 20252
20 20221

About Bowen Liu

Bowen Liu is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers), Higher Education and Teaching Methods (2 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (45 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (50 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (27 citations), Education (59 citations) and Hepatology (9 citations). Bowen Liu has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wanli Xing, Heng Luo, Xiaoping Fan, Xuelian Li, Lixue Chen, Yunfeng Wang, Ran Li, Ge Tan, Dan Zhang and Yi Gu. Their work appears in journals such as Interactive Learning Environments, British Journal of Educational Technology, Annals of Surgical Oncology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Thinking Skills and Creativity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact