Boping Ye

2.0k citations
57 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

  • Aging top 0.5%
    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
    • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Papers in

Boping Ye

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Boping Ye
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Aging 293
  • Molecular Medicine 152
  • Pollution 294
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 27
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 68
Replace Lili Tang with:
Lili Tang United States
Linbao Ji China
Isabel Gaivão Portugal
Changwon Yang South Korea
Xin Xu China
Bingbing Song China
Lijun Zhou China
Kai Liao China
Jong-Joo Kim South Korea
Boping Ye relative to Lili Tang United States Lili Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.1×
Lili Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Boping Ye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Boping Ye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boping Ye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boping Ye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Boping Ye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boping Ye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boping Ye. The network helps show where Boping Ye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Boping Ye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Boping Ye Line = papers co-authored together Boping Ye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017165
2 2012138
3 2014116
4 201298
5 201589
6 201682
7 201671
8 201265
9 201264
10 201656
11 201351
12 200850
13 200848
14 201444
15 201539
16 201632
17 201830
18 201028
19 200928
20 200928

About Boping Ye

Boping Ye is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Aging, Pharmacology, Ecology and Pollution, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (14 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (4 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (3 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (293 citations), Molecular Medicine (152 citations), Pollution (294 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (27 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (68 citations). Boping Ye has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dayong Wang, Na Wang, Xinyan Guo, Qiuli Wu, Huayue Ye, Yi‐Ping Li, Meng Tang, Yi Zhang, Yi Yang and Biao Chen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Fish & Shellfish Immunology, Neuroscience Bulletin, Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines and Animal nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact