Bodo Eckert

28 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Bodo Eckert
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Media Technology 140
  • Architecture 15
  • Ceramics and Composites 31
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 2
  • Materials Chemistry 165
Replace Atsushi Mori with:
Atsushi Mori Japan
Alexander Rudolph United States
R. Jenkins United States
Liangchen Chen China
Owen M. Williams Australia
Marina Carpineti Italy
Francesca Rosi Italy
Huixin Fan China
S. F. Wolf United States
Makoto Tomita Japan
Bodo Eckert relative to Atsushi Mori Japan Atsushi Mori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Atsushi Mori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bodo Eckert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bodo Eckert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bodo Eckert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bodo Eckert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bodo Eckert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bodo Eckert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bodo Eckert. The network helps show where Bodo Eckert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Bodo Eckert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bodo Eckert Line = papers co-authored together Bodo Eckert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003139
2 201285
3 200780
4 200452
5 199738
6 196223
7 199622
8 200820
9 200320
10 200013
11 199712
12 200912
13 200612
14 199411
15 200710
16 20139
17 19988
18 20048
19 20037
20 20066

About Bodo Eckert

Bodo Eckert is a scholar working on Media Technology, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Learning in Engineering (13 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (7 papers), Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (6 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (4 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (4 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers) and Crystal Structures and Properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (140 citations), Architecture (15 citations), Ceramics and Composites (31 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (2 citations) and Materials Chemistry (165 citations). Bodo Eckert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ralf Steudel, Sebastian Gröber, H. J. Jodl, Martin Vetter, Roberto Bini, Paolo Foggi, Maurizio Becucci, E. Castellucci, E. Schnell and J. Kestin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, High Pressure Research, Topics in current chemistry, European Journal of Physics and Journal of Applied Mechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact