Blake C. Stacey

1.1k citations
15 papers · 352 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Blake C. Stacey

15 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Blake C. Stacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 101
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 169
  • Artificial Intelligence 159
  • Applied Mathematics 36
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
Replace Todd Tilma with:
Todd Tilma Japan
Cédric Bény Germany
Yoshifumi Nakata Japan
M. Horibe Japan
André Großardt Germany
Péter Vrana Hungary
Esteban Castro-Ruiz Austria
Sepehr Nezami United States
Yijian Zou United States
Sonia Mazzucchi Italy
Blake C. Stacey relative to Todd Tilma Japan Todd Tilma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Todd Tilma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Blake C. Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Blake C. Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blake C. Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blake C. Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Blake C. Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blake C. Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blake C. Stacey. The network helps show where Blake C. Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Blake C. Stacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Blake C. Stacey Line = papers co-authored together Blake C. Stacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2017111
2 2004109
3 201729
4 201722
5 202018
6 202012
7 201910
8 201710
9 20219
10 20149
11 20165
12
Analysis and Synthesis of Minimal Informationally Complete Quantum Measurements
20185
13
QBist Quantum Mechanics: Quantum Theory as a Hero's Handbook
20161
14
Multiscale Structure in Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics
20151
15 20171

About Blake C. Stacey

Blake C. Stacey is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Economics and Econometrics and Molecular Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (11 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (6 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Graph theory and applications (1 paper), Neutrino Physics Research (1 paper) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (101 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (169 citations), Artificial Intelligence (159 citations), Applied Mathematics (36 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations). Blake C. Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Fuchs, Huangjun Zhu, Yaneer Bar‐Yam, Benjamin Allen, B. Viren, C.J. Virtue, T. Namba, M. H. Schwendener, Roger W. Sinnott and P. Antonioli. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. A, The European Physical Journal D, Physical Review Research, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and New Journal of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact