Birgit Reime

1.0k citations
31 papers · 672 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Birgit Reime

30 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Birgit Reime
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 258
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 234
  • Rehabilitation 61
  • Clinical Psychology 146
  • General Health Professions 174
Replace Shima Haghani with:
Shima Haghani Iran
Jane Morrell United Kingdom
Dawn M. Aycock United States
Jo‐Anne Rayner Australia
Sharon Ogden Burke Canada
Marion E. Wright United Kingdom
Hibah Osman Lebanon
Zeynep Özer Türkiye
Adama Brown United States
Lisbeth Ørtenblad Denmark
Birgit Reime relative to Shima Haghani Iran Shima Haghani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37×
Shima Haghani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Reime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Reime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Reime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Reime more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Reime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Reime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Reime. The network helps show where Birgit Reime may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Reime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Reime Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Reime links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200490
2 201485
3 200551
4 202347
5 200747
6 200845
7 200644
8 200643
9 201127
10 200926
11 201826
12 200023
13 201220
14 200512
15 201312
16 199812
17
Women's responses to information on mammographic breast density.
200710
18 200110
19 202010
20 20076

About Birgit Reime

Birgit Reime is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers) and Health and Medical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (258 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (234 citations), Rehabilitation (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (146 citations) and General Health Professions (174 citations). Birgit Reime has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia A. Janssen, Janice J. Eng, P Wenzlaff, Michael Klein, Elaine Carty, Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Pamela A. Ratner, Robert Liston, Elizabeth M. Ryan and Lee Saxell. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Research in Nursing & Health, European Journal of Public Health and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact