Birgit Heckemann

19 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Birgit Heckemann
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • General Health Professions 187
  • Leadership and Management 14
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 18
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Mahrokh Keshvari with:
Mahrokh Keshvari Iran
Karen Meier Robinson United States
Katarina Sjögren Forss Sweden
Gayle M. Roux United States
Linda P McAuliffe Australia
Rosemary Saunders Australia
Catharina Gillsjö Sweden
Susan Waterworth New Zealand
Renata Perfeito Ribeiro Brazil
Carola Skott Sweden
Birgit Heckemann relative to Mahrokh Keshvari Iran Mahrokh Keshvari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Mahrokh Keshvari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Heckemann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Heckemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Heckemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Heckemann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Heckemann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Heckemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Heckemann. The network helps show where Birgit Heckemann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Heckemann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Heckemann Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Heckemann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015213
2 2014123
3 201635
4 201828
5 201421
6 201917
7 201716
8 202214
9 201613
10 201911
11 20209
12 20219
13 20208
14 20228
15 20246
16 20245
17 20214
18 20223
19 20243
20 20240

About Birgit Heckemann

Birgit Heckemann is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Demography, having authored 22 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (187 citations), Leadership and Management (14 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (18 citations), Research and Theory (15 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Birgit Heckemann has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ruud J.G. Halfens, Helga Elisabeth Breimaier, Christa Lohrmann, Jos M. G. A. Schols, Sabine Hahn, Theo W.N. Dassen, Adelheid Zeller, Axel Wolf, Christopher Holmberg and Inger Ekman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Management, Acta Dermato Venereologica, International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, BMJ Open and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact