Bing Lang

64 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Bing Lang
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Biological Psychiatry 95
  • Developmental Neuroscience 129
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 346
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 31
  • Neurology 73
Replace Li‐Dong Huang with:
Li‐Dong Huang China
Katsunori Tajinda United States
Jonathan Carter Bean United States
Meritxell Pons‐Espinal Spain
María Martínez de Lagrán Spain
Tatsuyuki Muratake Japan
Parizad M. Bilimoria United States
Yanmei Tao China
Mert Ertunç Türkiye
Nay Lui Saw United States
Bing Lang relative to Li‐Dong Huang China Li‐Dong Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.8×
Li‐Dong Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Lang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Lang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Lang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Lang. The network helps show where Bing Lang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Lang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Lang Line = papers co-authored together Bing Lang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008220
2 200471
3 201368
4 201962
5 200662
6
HDAC9 is implicated in schizophrenia and expressed specifically in post-mitotic neurons but not in adult neural stem cells.
201241
7 202239
8 200936
9 200035
10 202132
11 202232
12 201130
13 201629
14 202227
15 201727
16 200626
17 200126
18 201623
19 201622
20 201921

About Bing Lang

Bing Lang is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (95 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (129 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (346 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (31 citations) and Neurology (73 citations). Bing Lang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Colin McCaig, Sanbing Shen, David St Clair, Jin Pu, Christina A. Chatzi, Chizu Nakamoto, Gong Ju, Yu‐Qiang Ding, Iain Campbell Mackie and Mark L. Day. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Translational Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Molecular Brain and Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact