Bin Lin

2.8k citations
70 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

    • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
    • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders

Papers in

Bin Lin

64 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Bin Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 908
  • Ophthalmology 434
  • Neurology 361
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 113
Replace Ricarda Diem with:
Ricarda Diem Germany
Ana I. Ramı́rez Spain
Li Guo United Kingdom
Kin‐Sang Cho United States
Myung‐Hoon Chun South Korea
Isabel Pinilla Spain
Rosa de Hoz Spain
Guomin Zhou China
Marcus Karlstetter Germany
Jeffrey H. Boatright United States
Bin Lin relative to Ricarda Diem Germany Ricarda Diem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ricarda Diem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bin Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bin Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bin Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bin Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bin Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bin Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bin Lin. The network helps show where Bin Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bin Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bin Lin Line = papers co-authored together Bin Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008230
2 2014199
3 2004142
4 2008124
5 2014118
6 200681
7 201281
8 201472
9 201465
10 201361
11 201349
12 201546
13 200543
14 201040
15 202139
16 201837
17 200336
18 200034
19 200231
20 201631

About Bin Lin

Bin Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (28 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (16 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (6 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (908 citations), Ophthalmology (434 citations), Neurology (361 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (113 citations). Bin Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Masland, Bo Peng, Kwok‐Fai So, Ke Wang, George L. Tipoe, Steven W. Wang, Nobushige Tanaka, Amane Koizumi, Satchidananda Panda and Jia Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, European Journal of Neuroscience and Cell Death and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact