Bin Lin
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 71
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 30
- Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research 24
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 50
- Co-authors
- Shao‐Jiang Song (112 shared papers)Xiao‐Xiao Huang (111 shared papers)Guo‐Dong Yao (47 shared papers)Maosheng Cheng (54 shared papers)Zhou Nie (9 shared papers)Xiaobo Wang (21 shared papers)Yongxiang Liu (34 shared papers)Le Zhou (21 shared papers)
- Journals
- Bioorganic Chemistry (36 papers)Phytochemistry (33 papers)Fitoterapia (28 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (14 papers)Organic Letters (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Bin Lin
338 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Biochemistry 450
- Pharmacology 445
- Pharmacology 739
- Molecular Biology 3.0k
- Organic Chemistry 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Bin Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Bin Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bin Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bin Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bin Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bin Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bin Lin. The network helps show where Bin Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bin Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 351 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 190 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 151 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 87 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 86 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 77 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 61 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 48 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 44 |
About Bin Lin
Bin Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 351 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (71 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (50 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (30 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (30 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (24 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (20 papers), Catalytic Alkyne Reactions (20 papers) and Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (450 citations), Pharmacology (445 citations), Pharmacology (739 citations), Molecular Biology (3.0k citations) and Organic Chemistry (1.1k citations). Bin Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Shao‐Jiang Song, Xiao‐Xiao Huang, Guo‐Dong Yao, Maosheng Cheng, Zhou Nie, Xiaobo Wang, Yongxiang Liu, Le Zhou, Shouzhuo Yao and Ming Bai. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic Chemistry, Phytochemistry, Fitoterapia, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Organic Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.