Bill King

31 papers receiving 661 citations

Peers

Bill King
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Applied Psychology 104
  • Physiology 502
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 148
  • Speech and Hearing 57
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 191
Replace Farahnaz Islam with:
Farahnaz Islam United States
Christine D Czoli Canada
Doris G Gammon United States
Amy L. Nyman United States
Lauren Kass Lempert United States
Shari P. Feirman United States
Greg Connolly United States
Andrew Anesetti‐Rothermel United States
Nada Kassem United States
Conrad J. Choinière United States
Bill King relative to Farahnaz Islam United States Farahnaz Islam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Farahnaz Islam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill King. The network helps show where Bill King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bill King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bill King Line = papers co-authored together Bill King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200796
2 200491
3 200861
4 201151
5 201049
6 199143
7 201037
8 200836
9 201327
10 200824
11
Review of the implications of changes in EU pesticides legislation on the production and export of fruits and vegetables from developing country suppliers
200021
12 200419
13 200717
14 201216
15 201015
16 201815
17 201011
18 20109
19 20117
20 19887

About Bill King

Bill King is a scholar working on Physiology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Applied Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (25 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (104 citations), Physiology (502 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (148 citations), Speech and Hearing (57 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (191 citations). Bill King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ron Borland, David Hammond, Richard J. O’Connor, Ann McNeill, K. Michael Cummings, Geoffrey T. Fong, Hua‐Hie Yong, Tara Elton‐Marshall, K. Michael Cummings and Christian Boudreau. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Tobacco Control, Harm Reduction Journal, Drug and Alcohol Review and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact