Bill Bowring

646 citations
51 papers · 174 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • International Law and Human Rights
    • European and International Law Studies
    • Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
    • European Union Policy and Governance
    • Global Peace and Security Dynamics
  • Law top 5%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies

Papers in

Bill Bowring

36 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Bill Bowring
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Political Science and International Relations 123
  • Law 42
  • History 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 95
  • General Energy 1
Replace Arie Bloed with:
Arie Bloed Netherlands
Fania Oz-Salzberger Australia
Duncan Kelly United Kingdom
Noah Feldman United States
Luc Reydams United States
Gerhard Werle Germany
Héctor Olásolo Colombia
Peter G. Danchin United States
Marc Bossuyt
Laurent Mayali United States
Bill Bowring relative to Arie Bloed Netherlands Arie Bloed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Arie Bloed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Bowring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Bowring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Bowring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Bowring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Bowring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Bowring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Bowring. The network helps show where Bill Bowring may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200222
2 200817
3
Law, Rights and Ideology in Russia: Landmarks in the Destiny of a Great Power
201313
4 201311
5
The Degradation of the International Legal Order?: The Rehabilitation of Law and the Possibility of Politics
200611
6 200910
7 200710
8 20006
9
Russia's accession to the Council of Europe and human rights: compliance or cross-purposes?
19975
10 20105
11 20124
12 20124
13 20104
14 20114
15 20124
16 20113
17 20153
18 20123
19
The 'droit et devoir d'ingérence': a timely new remedy for Africa?
19952
20 20082

About Bill Bowring

Bill Bowring is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, History and Language and Linguistics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European and International Law Studies (15 papers), International Law and Human Rights (9 papers), Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (7 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (6 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (5 papers), Soviet and Russian History (4 papers), Human Rights and Development (3 papers) and Legal and Policy Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (123 citations), Law (42 citations), History (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (95 citations) and General Energy (1 citation). Bill Bowring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Mexico. Their work appears in journals such as Europe Asia Studies, Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international, Review of Central and East European Law, Journal of Conflict and Security Law and Journal of Law and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact