Gerhard Werle
Impact in
-
- International Law and Human Rights
- War, Law, and Justice
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics
-
- Criminal Law and Policy
- German legal, social, and political studies
- Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Papers in
-
- International Law and Human Rights 29
- War, Law, and Justice 15
-
- Criminal Law and Policy 11
- German legal, social, and political studies 4
- Journals
- Journal of International Criminal Justice (7 papers)Criminal Law Forum (1 paper)South African Journal on Human Rights (1 paper)JuristenZeitung (4 papers)Böhlau Verlag eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanySouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Gerhard Werle
36 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Political Science and International Relations 360
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Law 16
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 4
- Health 3
Countries citing papers authored by Gerhard Werle
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerhard Werle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerhard Werle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerhard Werle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerhard Werle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerhard Werle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerhard Werle. The network helps show where Gerhard Werle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Gerhard Werle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 4 | Tratado de derecho penal internacional | 2005 | 29 |
| 5 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 12 | Justice in transition, prosecution and amnesty in Germany and South Africa | 2006 | 5 |
| 13 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 3 |
About Gerhard Werle
Gerhard Werle is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, History and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (29 papers), War, Law, and Justice (15 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (11 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (4 papers), German History and Society (2 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Legal Issues in South Africa (1 paper) and Legal Rights and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (360 citations), Sociology and Political Science (65 citations), Law (16 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (4 citations) and Health (3 citations). Gerhard Werle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Florian Jeßberger and Claus Roxin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Criminal Justice, Criminal Law Forum, South African Journal on Human Rights, JuristenZeitung and Böhlau Verlag eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.