B.H. Stolte
Impact in
-
- Byzantine Studies and History
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
Papers in
- Classics 8
- Byzantine Studies and History 8
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 7
- Co-authors
- N. van der Wal (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies (2 papers)The Classical Review (1 paper)Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (4 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
B.H. Stolte
6 papers receiving 7 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
- Classics 6
- Anthropology 8
- Archeology 6
- History 3
- Law 1
Countries citing papers authored by B.H. Stolte
This map shows the geographic impact of B.H. Stolte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.H. Stolte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.H. Stolte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B.H. Stolte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.H. Stolte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.H. Stolte. The network helps show where B.H. Stolte may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside B.H. Stolte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 2 | Collectio Tripartita: Justinian on Religious and Ecclesiastical Affairs | 1994 | 2 |
| 3 | The Partes of the Digest in the Codex Florentinus | 1984 | 1 |
| 4 | Magic and Byzantine law in the seventh century | 2002 | 1 |
| 5 | Aberra Jembere: Legal history of Ethiopia 1434-1974. Some aspects of substantive and procedural laws (diss. EU Rotterdam), Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit, Leiden: Afrika Studiecentrum 1998 | 1998 | 1 |
| 6 | Is Byzantine Law roman Law | 2004 | 1 |
| 7 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 8 | Trebatius in Palimpsest. Notes on Cicero Ad Familiares VII, 18 | 2005 | 0 |
| 9 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 10 | The Value of the Byzantine Tradition for Textual Criticism of the Corpus Iuris Civilis: 'Graeca leguntur' | 2011 | 0 |
| 11 | 1987 | 0 | |
| 12 | Henrik Brenkman, Jurist and Classicist: A Chapter from the History of Roman Law as Part of the Classical Tradition | 1981 | 0 |
About B.H. Stolte
B.H. Stolte is a scholar working on Classics, Anthropology, History, Archeology and Law, having authored 12 papers that have together received 10 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (6 citations), Anthropology (8 citations), Archeology (6 citations), History (3 citations) and Law (1 citation). B.H. Stolte has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include N. van der Wal. Their work appears in journals such as Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, The Classical Review, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), Medical Entomology and Zoology and University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.