The Classical Review

1.8k papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in The Classical Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Classical Review usually cover Anthropology (756 papers), Archeology (530 papers) and Philosophy (236 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (736 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (247 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Classical Review are J. B. Hainsworth, Ray Laurence, Ν. G. L. Hammond, Joel Christensen, Nicoletta Momigliano, M. L. West, Christopher Smith, T. D. Barnes, Graham Shipley and A. T. Fear.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Classical Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Classical Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Classical Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Classical Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Classical Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Classical Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Classical Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025