Beth Borosh
Impact in
-
- Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
Papers in
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 2
-
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 2
- Co-authors
- Sandra Weıntraub (2 shared papers)Samuel George Smith (1 shared paper)Laura Marie Curtis (1 shared paper)William Revelle (1 shared paper)Ian J. Deary (1 shared paper)Katherine R. Waite (1 shared paper)David N. Rapp (1 shared paper)David W. Baker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurology (1 paper)Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (1 paper)Journal of General Internal Medicine (1 paper)UCL Discovery (University College London) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Beth Borosh
4 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Beth Borosh's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 72
- Applied Psychology 74
- Psychiatry and Mental health 218
- Cognitive Neuroscience 251
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Borosh
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Borosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Borosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Borosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Borosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Borosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Borosh. The network helps show where Beth Borosh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Beth Borosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 1018 |
| 2 | 2013 | 185 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 169 | |
| 4 | Literacy, Cognitive Function, and Health: Results of the LitCog Study | 2012 | 1 |
About Beth Borosh
Beth Borosh is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Historical and Modern Theater Studies (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (72 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (218 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (251 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations). Beth Borosh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Weıntraub, Samuel George Smith, Laura Marie Curtis, William Revelle, Ian J. Deary, Katherine R. Waite, David N. Rapp, David W. Baker, Denise C. Park and Michael S. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Journal of General Internal Medicine and UCL Discovery (University College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.