Bert Maat

2.3k citations
34 papers · 824 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 23
    • Neuroscience and Music Perception 4
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 1
    • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 12
    • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 2

Bert Maat

33 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers

Bert Maat
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Sensory Systems 238
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 657
  • Speech and Hearing 146
  • Otorhinolaryngology 52
  • Neurology 56
Replace Jodi M. Ostroff with:
Jodi M. Ostroff Canada
Tom Frank United States
Steven J. Aiken Canada
Nicole T. Jiam United States
Robert W. Sweetow United States
Peter Kummer Germany
Wendy J. Huinck Netherlands
Thomas Littman United States
Matthew B. Fitzgerald United States
Patpong Jiradejvong United States
Bert Maat relative to Jodi M. Ostroff Canada Jodi M. Ostroff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Jodi M. Ostroff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Maat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Maat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Maat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Maat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Maat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Maat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Maat. The network helps show where Bert Maat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bert Maat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert Maat Line = papers co-authored together Bert Maat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201379
2 200876
3 201475
4 200074
5 200558
6 201853
7 201051
8 201644
9 200738
10 200834
11 201532
12 201528
13 201723
14 201320
15 201219
16 201818
17 200015
18 202115
19 201014
20 20189

About Bert Maat

Bert Maat is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Neurology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 34 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (23 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers), Noise Effects and Management (11 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (238 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (657 citations), Speech and Hearing (146 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (52 citations) and Neurology (56 citations). Bert Maat has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Wilko Grolman, Rolien H. Free, Christina D. Fuller, Deniz Başkent, Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, John J. Galvin, R. A. Tange, Hero P. Wit, Marloes Sparreboom and Wouter A. Dreschler. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, Hearing Research, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Trends in Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact