Inge Stegeman

163 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Inge Stegeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Otorhinolaryngology 578
  • Sensory Systems 368
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 941
  • Oncology 496
  • Neurology 147
Replace Cosimo de Filippis with:
Cosimo de Filippis Italy
Jennifer Joan Shin United States
Naresh Kumar Panda India
Sujana S. Chandrasekhar United States
Bo Gao China
Alok Thakar India
Christoph Matthias Germany
Saral Mehra United States
Talya Salz United States
Manfred Gross Germany
Inge Stegeman relative to Cosimo de Filippis Italy Cosimo de Filippis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Cosimo de Filippis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Stegeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Stegeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Stegeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Stegeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Stegeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Stegeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Stegeman. The network helps show where Inge Stegeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Stegeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Stegeman Line = papers co-authored together Inge Stegeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 174 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012175
2 2014111
3 201794
4 201391
5 201586
6 201378
7 201672
8 201469
9 201568
10 201668
11 201566
12 201365
13 202063
14 201359
15 201553
16 201549
17 202149
18 201448
19 201548
20 201648

About Inge Stegeman

Inge Stegeman is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Oncology, having authored 174 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (50 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (27 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (14 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (14 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (12 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (11 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers) and Academic Publishing and Open Access (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (578 citations), Sensory Systems (368 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (941 citations), Oncology (496 citations) and Neurology (147 citations). Inge Stegeman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Wilko Grolman, Adriana Leni Smit, Jeroen P. M. Peters, Alice van Zon, Patrick M Bossuyt, Robert Jan Stokroos, Stefan M. Willems, Evelien Dekker, Inge Wegner and Paul Fockens. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Laryngoscope, Frontiers in Neurology, Otology & Neurotology and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact