Bert Hayslip

166 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Bert Hayslip
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 284
  • Health 620
  • Demography 854
  • Clinical Psychology 846
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.5k
Replace Rosemary Blieszner with:
Rosemary Blieszner United States
Berit Ingersoll‐Dayton United States
Susan Krauss Whitbourne United States
Hiroko Akiyama United States
Jeffrey A. Burr United States
Emily A. Greenfield United States
Michael R. Levenson United States
Daniel W. L. Lai Canada
Karen Hooker United States
Jane E. Myers United States
Bert Hayslip relative to Rosemary Blieszner United States Rosemary Blieszner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Rosemary Blieszner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Hayslip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Hayslip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Hayslip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Hayslip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Hayslip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Hayslip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Hayslip. The network helps show where Bert Hayslip may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bert Hayslip, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert Hayslip Line = papers co-authored together Bert Hayslip links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005392
2 2017192
3
Working with custodial grandparents
2003124
4 1999112
5 200663
6 201461
7 200556
8 200954
9 200553
10 199650
11 199648
12 199847
13 199746
14 201139
15 201438
16 200336
17 199234
18 200332
19 198332
20 199532

About Bert Hayslip

Bert Hayslip is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Health and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 169 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (52 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (38 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (35 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (28 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (25 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (15 papers), Family Support in Illness (14 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (284 citations), Health (620 citations), Demography (854 citations), Clinical Psychology (846 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.5k citations). Bert Hayslip has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include Patricia L. Kaminski, Christine A. Fruhauf, Megan L. Dolbin‐MacNab, Benjamin P. Chapman, Gregory C. Smith, Charles A. Guarnaccia, Heidemarie Blumenthal, Julián Montoro‐Rodríguez, Michael Beyerlein and Craig E. Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, Journal of Personality Assessment and The Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact