Bernhard Hofmann

416 citations
16 papers · 350 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Bernhard Hofmann

15 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Bernhard Hofmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 55
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 209
  • Mechanical Engineering 244
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 143
Replace W. Döring with:
W. Döring Germany
S. Mitani Japan
Dhritiman Bhattacharya United States
Francesco Patti Italy
H. Liu United States
Haining Hu China
R. Snow United States
Zexuan Guo China
Daria Riabinina Canada
Mehdi Yazdanpanah United States
Bernhard Hofmann relative to W. Döring Germany W. Döring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34.9×
W. Döring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bernhard Hofmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernhard Hofmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernhard Hofmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernhard Hofmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernhard Hofmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernhard Hofmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernhard Hofmann. The network helps show where Bernhard Hofmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Bernhard Hofmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bernhard Hofmann Line = papers co-authored together Bernhard Hofmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1996102
2 199256
3 200137
4 199630
5 199529
6 200127
7 199227
8 199519
9 20029
10 19874
11 19983
12 20183
13 19952
14 20241
15 20221
16 19960

About Bernhard Hofmann

Bernhard Hofmann is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Behavioral Neuroscience and Music, having authored 16 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Applications (7 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (6 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers) and Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (55 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (209 citations), Mechanical Engineering (244 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (143 citations). Bernhard Hofmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include H. Kronmüller, Thomas Reininger, Olaf Jahn, Klaus Eckart, Joachim Spiess, Sabine Sydow, Thomas Liepold, C. Gómez‐Polo, M. Vázquez and H. Theuss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Peptides, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Protein Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact