Bernhard Böhm

69 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Bernhard Böhm
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 332
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 220
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 162
  • Genetics 262
Replace Helmut Schatz with:
Helmut Schatz Germany
Martin Pfohl Germany
Grażyna Sypniewska Poland
Andromachi Vryonidou Greece
Antonino Lasco Italy
G. Friedman Israel
Ilaria Barchetta Italy
Chang‐Hsun Hsieh Taiwan
Matthew Nguyen United States
Bernhard Böhm relative to Helmut Schatz Germany Helmut Schatz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Helmut Schatz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bernhard Böhm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernhard Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernhard Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernhard Böhm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernhard Böhm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernhard Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernhard Böhm. The network helps show where Bernhard Böhm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bernhard Böhm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bernhard Böhm Line = papers co-authored together Bernhard Böhm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010156
2 1999112
3 2002112
4 2005109
5 1999100
6 201294
7 200888
8 199788
9
Nuclear factor-kappaB is constitutively active in C-cell carcinoma and required for RET-induced transformation.
200188
10 200876
11 201154
12 200043
13 201340
14 200438
15 200337
16 199535
17 201434
18
[Pathological bone density in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases--prevalence and risk factors].
199933
19 201030
20 200928

About Bernhard Böhm

Bernhard Böhm is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics, Physiology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes and associated disorders (16 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (8 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (8 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (5 papers) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (332 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (220 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (162 citations) and Genetics (262 citations). Bernhard Böhm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Winfried März, Bernhard R. Winkelmann, Markus Nauck, Michael M. Hoffmann, Stefan Pilz, Heinrich Wieland, Marcus E. Kleber, Joachim E. Fischer, Tanja B. Grammer and Andreas Meinitzer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, Hormone and Metabolic Research, Circulation, Human Immunology and Der Ophthalmologe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact