Benoît Piot

34 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Benoît Piot
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Otorhinolaryngology 57
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 19
  • Oral Surgery 37
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 20
  • Hematology 38
Replace Michael C. Locher with:
Michael C. Locher Switzerland
G.H. Irvine United Kingdom
Yumiko Ohbayashi Japan
André H. Montazem United States
Walter G. Maxymiw Canada
Jerzy Arendt Poland
Jacob D’Souza United Kingdom
G. Gordon Snyder United States
Kyle J. Chambers United States
Ali Tawfik Egypt
Benoît Piot relative to Michael C. Locher Switzerland Michael C. Locher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Michael C. Locher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Piot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Piot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Piot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Piot. The network helps show where Benoît Piot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Piot Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Piot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199786
2 200261
3 201027
4 202226
5
Propofol versus sevoflurane for fiberoptic intubation under spontaneous breathing anesthesia in patients difficult to intubate.
201021
6 201620
7 201819
8 201217
9 201416
10 200114
11 200912
12 201912
13
[Difficult surgical management of facial neurofibromatosis type I or von Recklinghausen disease in children].
200211
14 20177
15 20126
16 20015
17 20235
18 20235
19
[Dental extraction in patients with bleeding disorders. Proposal of a protocol based on the type of anesthesia used].
20034
20
[The coral orbital floor. Its value in traumatology. The results of a multicenter study of 83 cases].
19964

About Benoît Piot

Benoît Piot is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Rheumatology, Surgery, Oncology and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 37 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (7 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (7 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (5 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (4 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (3 papers), Bone health and treatments (3 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (3 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (57 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (19 citations), Oral Surgery (37 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (20 citations) and Hematology (38 citations). Benoît Piot has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Mercier, Joël Ferri, Blandine Ruhin, Marc Trossaërt, Pascal Huet, Édith Fressinaud, É. Bardet, Pierre Corre, Olivier Malard and Hélios Bertin. Their work appears in journals such as Head & Neck, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Acta Neurochirurgica, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and Clinical Oral Investigations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact