Clinical Oral Investigations

6.2k papers and 114.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.2k papers published in Clinical Oral Investigations in the last decades have received a total of 114.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Oral Investigations usually cover Oral Surgery (3.0k papers), Orthodontics (2.3k papers) and Periodontics (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Dental materials and restorations (1.6k papers), Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (1.2k papers) and Dental Radiography and Imaging (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Oral Investigations are Nicoleta Ilie, Anton Sculean, Gottfried Schmalz, Reinhard Hickel, Matthias Hannig, Michel Goldberg, Reinhilde Jacobs, Adrian Lussi, Thomas Attin and Mutlu Özcan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Oral Investigations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Oral Investigations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Oral Investigations.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Oral Investigations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Oral Investigations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Oral Investigations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Oral Investigations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025